The only effective solution to ignorance is curiosity.
Is the education system in the US broken? That’s an interesting question, with a lot of different opinions. Some think that there is too much religion in education, some think that there is not enough. Some point at declining SAT scores, or the fact that some schools test poorly on one variety of test or another, where others do not. Some point at other statistics, the results of the ‘no child left behind’ or the reading comprehension levels of college basketball players.
I think they are all missing the critical factors. The education system in the US is designed (or at least in my opinion should be designed) as an enabling platform.
You can not force someone to learn. Well, there may be some debate on that, but essentially when you get to a certain level of education, the person receiving an education has to be engaged in the process. You literally can’t inject knowledge into their brain for latter use. Because there is the requirement that the student be engaged in the process many of the evaluations of how well various education systems work is flawed. And the results are being used in was that are very counter to the declared intent.
Let’s start with the latest example of bad leadership in education. “No Child Left Behind.” Schools are awarded funding based on the results of standardized testing of the student body. The better the students do, the more funding is awarded to the school. Now at some level this makes sens. Give schools who don’t perform well an incentive to do better. Right?
OK, here’s the flaw. Most of the schools that do not do well, have limited funds available to them, and while the incentive is there, they don’t have the means to implement the changes and provide the tools that would lead to the desired improvements. Compounding the issue is that the schools which do have better results, then go on to get even better results as a result of having more funds to work with, There are some who would suggest that this is a deliberate effort to keep the poor ever poorer. Unfortunately it is the educational initiative under which we are working at this time. So until that is changed, we’ll have to suffer the shortness of sight we are saddled with.
Some would suggest that the solution to our educational woes is private schools. Now while that does provide some potential advantages, unfortunately it is not a solution that supports a universal initiative. There will always be private schools. And for the most part they will cost less per student than public schools do. If you wish to send your children to private school, I certainly don’t think it’s a bad idea, but I also don’t think that it’s going to work for the vast majority of people. You know as well as I that many students will not qualify for scholarships who can’t attend because their families can’t afford the tuition, and so these students will be going to public school as long as they are required to go to school. And from a bringing education to the general population perspective having the ability to exclude a student because it would cost too much to support them, or for any other reason that a private business may choose not to accept a student as a customer means that there will always be a need for a public education system.
The starting point to any education is not targeting specific standards to meet at graduation. That is a laudable goal, but there will be many people who either so far exceed these targets as to make them meaningless, and others who will struggle to come close to the goal. It is an objective, but not a starting point.
The starting point is to encourage curiosity. That one characteristic is the foundation of every education plan. If you loose curiosity, there is no reason to learn something. Some might suggest that working on solving problems is a means to learning even without curiosity. But solving problems is dependent upon wanting that problem solved, and to learn from it means that you want to know what the solution to that problem is, and that is curiosity.
So how does one encourage curiosity? Encouraging curiosity is a three step process. Step 1 identify what the student can do, and likes to do. Step 2 identify what the student would like to be able to do. Step 3, show that what the student wants to do, beyond what they can do, can be done. Ok, someone will probably say ‘what about asking the student if they want to see how that is done?’ and the answer is that if you already know they want to do that, then simply demonstrating that it is possible will answer that question up front. Oh, they may not want the person demonstrating how it is done to show them, but that is where you as a teacher have to step in and be the person who provides the resources for the student to learn.
Now you have a curious student. At the moment they are curious about something that they want to get better at, which may, or may not be something that is immediately working towards the goal of the school or the community. But they are curious. Being curious, that curiosity will go a little beyond just the lesson for that task. Since you are teaching them how to do that better, you have the opportunity to ‘mention’ that you had the same problem when you first learned how to do this. But that along the way you learned a little bit about other people who do this, and, hey would you like to know more?
For pretty much every possible activity that you are involved in, there is a history of interactions between that specific activity, and other activities. If you don’t understand how that works, go pick up a copy of ‘The Pinball Effect’ or watch the various ‘Connections’ series. A larger scale version of this is to read a dictionary and follow the ‘See Also’ references. Wikipedia (while perhaps not the best of reference resources) also presents a great example of how things interact. Knowing how things interact you can show that there is a history that is written down for how to take a little bit of knowledge about this and turn it into a bit more ability. Or a lot more ability.
The fact that you can show that someone has shown how to turn knowledge into a means of showing other people how to do the same thing, means that they have the opportunity to turn the knowledge that they have into something someone else can use as well. And that starts them on the idea of sharing knowledge, teaching, and possibly writing.
At some point you run into the fact that not every concept is easy to translate into words. Occasionally numbers are the primary means of sharing information. That includes being able to count and translate products into money, and as a result you start working on some fairly basic math.
That gets us into reading, writing and arithmetic. Where you take that starting point is up to you. But you can tell when you are doing it wrong. When the students start acting like they are board, when they loose their sense of curiosity, you are doing it wrong. Now that can very well be that you don’t understand how what you are teaching can be exciting. How it can satisfy curiosity. How it can increase curiosity about other areas of study.
The education system we primarily have today is designed around the mass production model. Put all of the raw materials through the same collection of experiences, and you should end up with a consistent result. However if you have ever read the tags of things like leather jackets, or other natural materials products, you will note that they specifically state that the fact that the materials started out as raw materials means that they have individual characteristic that will result in differences between specific items in the product lines. And that applies to students as well. That doesn’t mean that students who don’t fit in the mold can’t be taught. Some of the finest craftsmanship in the arts, carpentry, and many other fields all ow their results to the fact that the craftsman or artist could see what the capabilities of a specific piece of raw material is, and can take that knowledge, and turn it into a thing of beauty or function that exceeds entirely what can be achieved in a mass mold.
We need teachers. We need teachers who can recognize when a specific teaching technique is not working, and can adapt to that situation and either move the student into a better learning environment for them, or if they will fit in with the rest, perhaps with a brief involvement with other teachers, apply that information as well. We need teachers who can work one on one with individuals, or as a team for some individual students.
Along the way, we need teachers to recognize when a student will be a good teacher and give them encouragement. For we will need new teachers in the years to come. People who can teach in the traditional styles. People who can teach by doing. By letting the student do.
And since the reality of learning is that we start one place, and try to get further than the last person who started down this path, we need to have teachers who can show students how to go beyond the current base of knowledge, and make what they learn available to others.
We will continue to have standardized testing. We will continue to have students do better than others at the same age, and students who do not do as well when older. But an education system that recognizes that the goal is not to find a way to make the most ‘successful’ of public schools richer, but to help the least successful of public school systems turn around that lack of success into a new and better approach to reaching those goals. The money that gets spent may show up in better teachers, or a better environment to learn in. It may be a significant change in the administration of the school, or perhaps paying for lunch or breakfast for students who may otherwise go hungry, which will affect the level of curiosity that students have.
OK, you may have noticed that I have not included a lot of things that seem specific to parents of students. Perhaps I’m not concerned with them, or think that there isn’t much we can do about them, so don’t even bring it up? That’s not it at all. First parents, foster parents, guardians, are all absolutely critical to the development of students. Parents are the first place where curiosity can be encouraged. They are the first teachers any student will have. And they need badly to know that they are important to turning the curiosity about the world around them into a window into becoming better at showing the world the wonders that they are a part of.
As with every skill, teaching at this level is not something that is a given ability. Some parents are better teachers than others. Kids don’t come with an instruction manual. And parents don’t always know how to read, if they did. But currious parents can find out more. Most communities have some sort of parenting and teaching system in place. It may be parents visiting at the playground or shopping mall. It may be informal classes at a community center, or even formal education at a school. But you can find out more.
Be curious. Share what you learn. You might find the experience enlightening.